Venture Hacks http://venturehacks.com Advice and introductions for entrepreneurs. Wed, 21 May 2008 21:15:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 en From Incoherent to High Concept Pitch http://feeds.venturehacks.com/~r/venturehacks/~3/295332506/incoherent-to-high-concept http://venturehacks.com/articles/incoherent-to-high-concept#comments Wed, 21 May 2008 21:15:31 +0000 Nivi http://venturehacks.com/articles/incoherent-to-high-concept Anthony Stevens read our article on high concept pitches and decided to write a high concept pitch for his startup:

“So, let’s see: my startup is Crowdify, a tool for brand and reputation managers to discover new insights into consumers’ attitudes about their subjects and make better decisions about marketing and public relations strategy. We do this through semantic analysis applied to consumer-generated correlations among and between brands and reference data. Further, we utilize social-networking metaphors to keep interesting information flowing back and forth between branding people and the consuming public.”

Most elevator pitches look like this: long, boring, senseless, and ineffective. You probably stopped reading after the first sentence. Or maybe the pitch looked so long you didn’t read it at all.

hybrid.png

Fortunately, Anthony came to same conclusion:

“That’s a little wordy, especially for a business card, so let’s try a little high-concept pitch development. Hmm… relations that people will understand. “A for B”, where A is a known brand in my space, and B is the target audience… how about:

Facebook for Brands

“I think I like it! Not least of which is the rumor floating around today that Facebook is about to be acquired by Microsoft for something like 15 to 20 billion dollars.”

I like it too. Anthony started with a long paragraph that actually hurt him more than it helped. Then he turned it into a high concept pitch that opens the door to a conversation about his company.

]]>
http://venturehacks.com/articles/incoherent-to-high-concept/feed http://venturehacks.com/articles/incoherent-to-high-concept
High Concept Pitches for Startups http://feeds.venturehacks.com/~r/venturehacks/~3/293814172/high-concept-pitch http://venturehacks.com/articles/high-concept-pitch#comments Mon, 19 May 2008 22:37:08 +0000 Nivi http://venturehacks.com/articles/high-concept-pitch “For investors, the product is nothing.”

Marc Hedlund

Summary: A high concept pitch distills a startup’s vision into a single sentence. It’s the perfect tool for fans who are spreading the word about your company.

Hollywood has perfected the art of the high concept pitch:

“Its Jaws in space!” (Alien)

“A bus with a bomb!” (Guess.)

“Snakes on a plane!” (Do I really have to spell it out for you.)

“A serial killer who bases murders on the seven deadly sins!” (Se7en)

“Bambi meets Terminator!” (Okay, I made this one up.)

High concept pitches for startups.

“Summarize the company’s business on the back of a business card,” says Sequoia. We agree—every startup should have a high concept pitch:

“Friendster for dogs.” (Dogster)

“Flickr for video.” (YouTube)

“We network networks.” (Cisco)

“The Firefox of media players.” (Songbird)

“Massively Multiplayer Online Learning.” (Grockit)

“The entrepreneurs behind the entrepreneurs.” (Sequoia)

“Venture Hacks.” (Guess who.)

A high concept pitch distills a startup’s vision into a single sentence.

alien.png

What makes a good high concept pitch?

First, the pitch should be brief: one short sentence is perfect.

Second, people should already understand the building blocks of the pitch: buses, bombs, Jaws, space, the seven deadly sins, Flickr, Firefox, MMOGs, et cetera. The pitch combines the building blocks by using analogy, synthesis, juxtaposition, combination, whatever; e.g. “Jaws in space.”

Third, the pitch probably isn’t your company’s tagline. YouTube’s tagline is “Broadcast Yourself,” and their pitch is “Flickr for video”. If you’re lucky, you can find a pitch that’s also a tagline, e.g. Cisco’s “We network networks.” But don’t worry if your pitch isn’t a tagline.

What’s a high concept pitch good for?

First, the pitch is the perfect tool for fans who are spreading the word about your company. Investors use the pitch when they tell their partners about your startup. Customers use the pitch when they rave about your product. The press uses the pitch when they cover the company, e.g. see Mike Arrington’s article, Comparing The Flickrs of Video.

hedlund.jpgSecond, the high concept pitch is a great way to describe your product and vision in an elevator pitch. We started this article with a quote from Marc Hedlund: “For investors, the product is nothing.” Bad elevator pitches go on and on about the product. Good ones boil it down to a high concept pitch. The rest of the elevator pitch should be devoted to your traction, social proof, team, and market.

What are your favorite high concept pitches? Add them to the comments.

Related: “High Concept” startups.

]]>
http://venturehacks.com/articles/high-concept-pitch/feed http://venturehacks.com/articles/high-concept-pitch
Lijit’s CEO on raising money from angels. http://feeds.venturehacks.com/~r/venturehacks/~3/286263575/vernon-on-angels http://venturehacks.com/articles/vernon-on-angels#comments Thu, 08 May 2008 18:37:18 +0000 Nivi http://venturehacks.com/articles/vernon-on-angels todd.jpgTodd Vernon, the CEO of Lijit, has written a great article on raising money from angels. I especially like his taxonomy of angels:

The Family Investor: The Family Investor is likely not really a classic Angel Investor at all but rather a supportive family member that “knows you”. Their motivation is likely out of support (sometimes guilt), but their basic investment thesis is they trust you. For me these are the worst type of investor because you likely have intimate knowledge of their financial situation and whether or not they ’should’ be investing. Likely, they have no inherent feel if your idea is good or not, but may have changed your diaper at one time or another and have overcome that experience to hand you a check for $25K or $50K. Personally, I like this category of investor the least because the investment is totally emotional and personal – and that sucks in business. But based on the financial situation of the individuals involved and the relationships this can work ok if everyone comes into the situation with their eyes open, but go out of your way to make sure.

The Relationship Investor: The Relationship Investor is probably one or more co-workers from a previous gig or business friends you have known for a while. They may or may not understand what your new company is doing but they have had a track record working with you. They want to be supportive, but are looking for a return. You won’t lose them as friends if things go bad, but the investment for them is likely not ‘trivial’. In my experience these are good Angels to have, again as long as their eyes are open going in. These people can also be wildly supportive of you in terms of finding employees and other resources.

The Idea Investor: The Idea Investor is probably very familiar with the space your company is targeting. These are in some ways the very best types of Angels because to some degree they validate your idea. There investment is based on the Idea and there is little emotion around the table (always good). If you can get them onboard they can open doors into partner relationships and just generally good advice. You will spend most of your time convincing the Idea Investor that you and team are the right people to attack this problem (as they likely don’t have a strong relationship with you or the team). Often an influential Idea Investor makes a good early board member for the company.

The Once Removed Investor: The Once Removed Investor is likely connected through a personal or professional relationship with either the Relationship Investor or the Idea Investor. They likely don’t know you, and they likely don’t have a clue if your idea is good or bad but they have translated the trust in the investment to the person they know. This is a great way to get additional Angel Investors onboard, but without a solid Relationship Investor or Idea Investor it just isn’t going to happen.”

Read the rest of Todd’s article.

(Via: Ask the VC.)

]]>
http://venturehacks.com/articles/vernon-on-angels/feed http://venturehacks.com/articles/vernon-on-angels
VH Twitters: Ball Punching Edition http://feeds.venturehacks.com/~r/venturehacks/~3/277279719/microhacks-twitter http://venturehacks.com/articles/microhacks-twitter#comments Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:50:41 +0000 Nivi http://venturehacks.com/articles/microhacks-twitter We usually quote other people’s genius in our Twitter feed but, once in a while, we throw in a microhack of our own. Here are a few of the popular microhacks:

You don’t need permission to start a company. From investors, co-founders, or anyone else.

Trying to recruit while you’re in “stealth mode” is like punching yourself in the balls (see picture).

punchballs.jpg

Better to do the right thing wrong than the wrong thing right.

Sales: Always be closing. Product: Always be releasing. (Sam Purtill replies, “Engineers: Always be coding.”)

Advice is for learning, not copying.

Don’t ask investors what they think. Ask your customers.

Competitors copy success, not ideas.

Traction speaks louder than words.

By the way, I figured out which twitters were popular by looking for entries that people “liked” in my FriendFeed.

Image Source: RobbinsSports.

]]>
http://venturehacks.com/articles/microhacks-twitter/feed http://venturehacks.com/articles/microhacks-twitter
How do we set the valuation for a seed round? http://feeds.venturehacks.com/~r/venturehacks/~3/272582817/seed-valuation http://venturehacks.com/articles/seed-valuation#comments Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:34:32 +0000 Nivi http://venturehacks.com/articles/seed-valuation A reader asks:

“My question is how do we value a company with no sales? I understand it’s an arbitrary valuation but is there anything we can possibly base it on? Is there a “default” valuation for companies in a seed round?”

We’ll answer this question with some questions (and answers) of our own:

  1. How much money do we need?
  2. How do we set a valuation from this budget?
  3. How do we express our valuation to investors?
  4. What’s the range for seed round valuations?
  5. How low do seed round valuations go?
  6. How much money can we raise in a seed round?
  7. How much dilution should we expect in a seed round?

1. How much money do we need?

First, figure out how much money you need to run at least two experiments*. Then tack on 3 more months of runway so you can raise another round before you run out of money. This is the minimum amount of money you should raise. For example, let’s say you need $100K.

* Your experiments should be constructed such that a positive result will let you raise more money at a higher valuation.

2. How do we set a valuation from this budget?

Now decide what percentage of the company you will sell for $100K. Pick a number between 10% and 20% of the company’s post-money. You can go below 10% but that probably means your valuation will be too high or you will raise too little money.

For example, let’s say you’re willing to sell up to 15% of the company—that’s your bottom line dilution. This implies a bottom line post-money valuation of $666K.

3. How do we express our valuation to investors?

Finally, tell investors that,

“We think we can make the company significantly more valuable if we raise $100K—that’s our target. And we’re willing to sell up to 10% of the company to reach that target.”

10% is your aspirational dilution. It’s the lowest dilution you can justify. It’s the lowest dilution you can say with a straight face.

Notice that you didn’t explicitly state your valuation. Combining the dilution (10%) with the amount you’re raising ($100K) implies a post-money valuation of $1M. But the valuation is not explicit. This gives you room to raise your valuation if you raise more than $100K (and we suggest you raise as much money as possible).

4. What’s the range for seed round valuations?

If $25K buys 1% of company, your post-money is $2.5M—that’s on the high end.

If $25K buys 5% of company, your post-money is $0.5M—that’s on the low end.

5. How low do seed round valuations go?

Y Combinator has set new lows for seed round valuations. They get away with it because they also set new highs for helping seed stage companies.

According to the YC FAQ, they buy about 6% of a company for $15K-$20K. So the post-money valuation of their investments is $250K-$333K.

But don’t fixate on valuation. Low valuations aren’t bad if you keep the dilution down too. 6% dilution is very low if the company makes a lot of progress with $15K-$20K.

6. How much money can we raise in a seed round?

If you sell 20% of your company at a $2.5M post-money, you raise $500K. That’s about the maximum for a seed round. Beyond that is Series A country.

7. How much dilution should we expect in a seed round?

Take as much money as you can while keeping dilution between 15-30% (10%-20% of the dilution goes to investors and 5%-10% goes to the option pool).

Compare this to a Series A which might have 30%-55% dilution. (20%-40% of the dilution goes to investors and 10%-15% goes to the option pool.)

A seed round can pay for itself if the quality of your investors and progress brings your eventual Series A dilution down from 55% to 30% (for the same amount of Series A cash).

Don’t over-optimize your dilution. Raising money is often harder than you expect, especially for first-time entrepreneurs.

Smart investors don’t over-optimize dilution either. They want to buy enough points to own a good chunk of the company. But they want to leave the founders with enough points to keep them highly motivated to build a lot of value for the founders and investors alike.

Finally, if you’ve made it this far, please enjoy the following presentation:


]]>
http://venturehacks.com/articles/seed-valuation/feed http://venturehacks.com/articles/seed-valuation
New investors on Venture Hacks http://feeds.venturehacks.com/~r/venturehacks/~3/271755254/investors http://venturehacks.com/articles/investors#comments Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:57:30 +0000 Nivi http://venturehacks.com/articles/investors Here are a few of the brave investors who have joined the Venture Hacks community. I’ve also included descriptions of the types of companies they’re looking for:

josh.jpg Josh Kopelman from First Round Capital is “looking for companies that find new uses for existing data sets.”



mitch.jpg Mitch Lasky from Benchmark Capital says, “I still believe in mobile.”



march.jpg Marc Hustvedt, an angel investor, is “looking seriously at IPTV.”



aydin.jpgAydin Senkut, an angel investor at Felicis Ventures, has a “focus on early stage consumer internet companies.”



james.jpg James Cham, from Bessemer Venture Partners, is “looking for companies that see the commercial opportunities in inference engines.”


We’ll highlight other investors (and startups) in an upcoming post. Browse the community while we’re in private beta or request an invite to help us test the site.

]]>
http://venturehacks.com/articles/investors/feed http://venturehacks.com/articles/investors
Former VC helps entrepreneurs raise money. http://feeds.venturehacks.com/~r/venturehacks/~3/271264104/4-things http://venturehacks.com/articles/4-things#comments Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:00:35 +0000 Nivi http://venturehacks.com/articles/4-things bill.jpg In 4 Things to Do After You Get Your First Term Sheet, Bill Burnham, a former partner at Mobius and Softbank Capital, writes,

“I’ve recently been involved in helping a couple companies with their first major round of VC financing. It’s actually been pretty interesting for me because I have historically been on the other side of the table. In addition to generating several stories worthy of “The Funded” and getting a better appreciation of the trials and tribulations that entrepreneurs must go through when trying to raise money, I also gained a better appreciation for just how important it is to properly manage the “end game” of a VC financing.

“What is the “end game”? The End Game generally takes place after you have gotten a term sheet, but before you actually sign it. How well you manage this process can make a big difference in the actual terms and pricing you ultimately get, so it pays to approach this process as thoughtfully and diligently as you do any other part of fundraising.”

“With that in mind I present 4 things that you should definitely do after getting your 1st term sheet:

“1. Get a second term sheet: It may sound flip, but this is the single most important thing you should do upon getting your 1st term sheet. Nothing loosens up a VC’s purse strings or makes them more flexible on a particular term than the threat of competition. Without competition (real or perceived) you have very little leverage against a VC. Now getting one term sheet, let alone two, is tough enough, but getting two must be your goal and you must not waiver in pursuit of that goal even you after you get the 1st one. The biggest problem most entrepreneurs have executing on this strategy is that they have mismanaged the sequencing of their fundraising. Many entrepreneurs make the mistake of pursuing an “in order” fundraising process whereby they take one meeting, run that process to its logical conclusion and if that doesn’t work out try to get a meeting with another VC. VC fundraising must be pursued concurrently! You must put as many irons in the fire in as short a time as possible so that all the firms start the process at roughly the same time. As firms progress through the process, you should do your best to try and “herd” them along by trying to slow down the ones pushing ahead and speed up the ones lagging behind. The ultimate goal is to ensure that when you receive your first term sheet you have several other firms that are very close (within a week or so) to potentially issuing their own term sheets. Proper sequencing ensures that you are not forced to take an inferior “bird in hand”.”

Read Bill’s great post for the rest of his suggestions. He agrees with everything we’ve been writing about, so he is obviously quite brilliant.

]]>
http://venturehacks.com/articles/4-things/feed http://venturehacks.com/articles/4-things
How much money should we raise? http://feeds.venturehacks.com/~r/venturehacks/~3/270190522/how-much-money http://venturehacks.com/articles/how-much-money#comments Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:14:32 +0000 Nivi http://venturehacks.com/articles/how-much-money Summary: Raise as much money as possible. With these caveats: (1) maintain control at any cost, (2) monitor your liquidation preference, and (3) act like you don’t have a lot of money. Also understand that if you do raise a lot of money, you will have to (1) “go big or go home” and (2) make a lot of progress if you ever want to raise money again. Alternatively, if you would rather maintain your exit options, at least raise enough money to run two experiments.

How much money should you raise? As much as possible—with some caveats. But hey! don’t take our word for it.

Two investors’ opinions.

kleiner.jpgEugene Kleiner, Founder of Kleiner Perkins:

“When the money is available, take it.”

janeway.jpgWilliam Janeway, Managing Director of Warburg Pincus:

“Failure to execute operationally is not the only source of risk; every venture is also subject to volatility in the price and availability of capital due to the volatility of the stock market. After the collapse of the Internet Bubble, many promising companies foundered because their funding dried up.

“By contrast, our biggest successes at Warburg Pincus (VERITAS, BEA) have come from inverting the normal venture funding model, with the visionary investor as company co-founder… And we have supported the multi-year process of building a sustainable business by underwriting all of the capital needed to reach positive cash flow, thereby not only enabling management to focus full-time on the business but also insuring against the risks generated by a volatile stock market…

“In the post-Bubble world, long-term financial commitments are required to fund the ventures that will fulfill the long-term technological vision and implement the long-term commercial promise of the Internet Age.”

Two founders’ opinions.

ramsay.jpgMike Ramsay, Founder and CEO of Tivo:

“One of the reasons that TiVO is thriving today is that we were well-capitalized. We were able to power our way through the downturn—that early 2000 period when [our competitor] Replay went away. We were capitalized enough that we knew we could ride through it. While we had to make a few adjustments at the company, there was never a question that we were going to survive. We knew we were going to survive.”

andreessen.jpgMarc Andreessen, inventor of the bendy-straw:

“So how much money should I raise?

“In general, as much as you can.

“Without giving away control of your company, and without being insane.

“Entrepreneurs who try to play it too aggressive and hold back on raising money when they can because they think they can raise it later occasionally do very well, but are gambling their whole company on that strategy in addition to all the normal startup risks.

“Suppose you raise a lot of money and you do really well. You’ll be really happy and make a lot of money, even if you don’t make quite as much money as if you had rolled the dice and raised less money up front.

“Suppose you don’t raise a lot of money when you can and it backfires. You lose your company, and you’ll be really, really sad.

“Is it really worth that risk?

“…Taking these factors into account, though, in a normal scenario, raising more money rather than less usually makes sense, since you are buying yourself insurance against both internal and external potential bad events — and that is more important than worrying too much about dilution or liquidation preference.”

Make sure you read Marc’s full article for his caveats: How much funding is too little? Too much?

Guidelines to consider no matter how much you raise.

No matter how much money you raise,

  1. Maintain control at any cost.
  2. Monitor your total liquidation preference and avoid liquidation preferences above 1x non-participating. You will have to sell the company for at least the liquidation preference before the common stockholders see a penny.
  3. Raise enough money to run more than one experiment. Some companies need 12 months of runway to do two or more experiments, others might need 24 months. Seed stage companies that can’t raise enough money to run more than one experiment should keep their burn down to extend their runway.
  4. Act like you don’t have money.

Guidelines to consider if you do raise a lot of money.

If you do raise a lot money,

  1. Understand that your investors will have very high expectations. You have will have to “go big or go home”.
  2. You will have to make a lot of progress with this round if the company ever wants to raise money again.

Alternatively, if you would rather keep your liquidation preference low and maintain your exit options, at least raise enough money to run two experiments.

Raise too little money and you may go out of business when you run into trouble. Raise too much money and you may make less (or zero) dough when you exit. Take your pick: disaster vs. dilution.

Image Sources: Marty Katz for The New York Times, SFGate, Wired.

]]>
http://venturehacks.com/articles/how-much-money/feed http://venturehacks.com/articles/how-much-money
Venture Hacks Tweets: Kleiner edition http://feeds.venturehacks.com/~r/venturehacks/~3/267138892/twitter-3 http://venturehacks.com/articles/twitter-3#comments Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:09:24 +0000 Nivi http://venturehacks.com/articles/twitter-3 The latest great quotes from the VH Twitter feed: twitter.com/venturehacks (RSS):

Kleiner Perkins

kpcb.png“Entrepreneurs do more than anyone thinks possible, with less than anyone thinks possible.” – John Doerr

“If the reason you’re taking on a mission is for the money you’ll make, I believe you’ll fail.” – John Doerr

“Where most entrepreneurs fail is on the things they don’t know they don’t know.” – Vinod Khosla

“How would you compete against yourself?” – Vinod Khosla (ppt)

“We are in the company building business, not in the ‘deal’ or ‘capital’ business.” – Khosla Ventures

“The great danger of dealing with venture capitalists is the ’slow maybe’.” – John Doerr

“We never ‘vote’ against management teams in our board role, except in making CEO decisions.” – Khosla Ventures

“All start up companies have one thing in common–they all get in trouble. It’s how they and you on the board handle their trouble that separates the winners from the losers.” – Tom Perkins

Peter Drucker

peterdrucker002.jpg“You cannot build performance on weaknesses. You can build only on strengths.” – Peter Drucker

“One does not start with facts. One starts with opinions.” – Peter Drucker

Warren Buffett

“I’ve never gone to bed with an ugly woman, but I’ve sure woke up with a few.” – Warren Buffett, explaining bad investments

“When the phone don’t ring, you’ll know it’s me.” – Warren Buffett, explaining how he might say ‘no’

“If you are a professional and have confidence, then I would advocate lots of concentration.” – Warren Buffett

Sundry

“Succeed and you are a brilliant visionary. Fail and you are a delusional loser.” – Don Dodge

“You don’t need permission to start a company. From investors, co-founders, or anyone else.” – Venture Hacks

Read more quotes in the VH Twitter feed and my personal Twitter feed: twitter.com/nivi (RSS).

Thanks: To James Cham for the Tom Perkins interview.

]]>
http://venturehacks.com/articles/twitter-3/feed http://venturehacks.com/articles/twitter-3
Missionaries, not mercenaries http://feeds.venturehacks.com/~r/venturehacks/~3/262455139/missionaries http://venturehacks.com/articles/missionaries#comments Wed, 02 Apr 2008 06:19:40 +0000 Nivi http://venturehacks.com/articles/missionaries This is a great slide from John Doerr’s talk at Stanford:

missionaries.png

It’s a little hard to read but it’s worth a squint. Or just watch this 4 minute video where he lays it out:


Link: John Doerr on Mercenaries and Missionaries.

]]>
http://venturehacks.com/articles/missionaries/feed http://venturehacks.com/articles/missionaries